Franchise: May 13, 2008 - 10:50 PM PST
This idea of feminine independence is not new...
LOL! That's right! haha...
Well, from some of my personal experience, I can say I definately have been attracted to jerks. Big ones. Big Jerks. And the thing about big jerks is that when they don't like you they are big jerks! But when they do.... oh boy, it's a lot of fun for a little while, but then it's over as fast as it started. In my experience the jerks find some other girl and move on a lot quicker that the nice guys. Now I am with a nice guy who can be a jerk sometimes. But then again, I can be a jerk sometimes too!
It's a vicious cycle!!! I think you'd experience the same thing if you were with me. Just putting it out there! I can be sarcastic and crass and at the same time nice and sweet
Stay tuned for a writing work entitled "Ode to a Karoake Jockey" LOL!
faeriel Said:
Franchise Said:
lorcas Said:
In response to trenchael:
The first post was a generalization. (posted by flowrktty)
The second post was an example of the generalization perhaps being flawed (posted by Lorcas)
The third post supported the first post (posted by trenacheal)
The fourth post explored the impact of the generalization, and a refutation. (posted by Lorcas)
The fifth and sixth post were clarification questions that may have led to a misunderstanding.
You gave me a simple question, i responded with a simple answer. I believe that was a fair transaction. That being said, i did not intend to say that you "were harmful or ignorant".
It can be inferred reasonably that you arrived in defense of the notion that "women like Jerks" since you posted directly after my second post. So, you were defending a generality, on some level you agreed and at this point in the post, continued to perpetuate this generality. That being said, the last portion of my post was directed at the notion of "women being attracted to jerks". The notion of "women being attracted to jerks" is harmful and ignorant, in and of itself. This was not a personal attack or an assessment of your character.
I have not read your other post, I was only reading responses directed towards me.
Also, I think that you make a fair judgment about men and women perhaps not realizing they are in a unhealthy relationship.
I think that you have clarified what your intent was.
My only quibble was that it was not clear that it was both women and men, rather it was uniquely women who were being duped.
I do stand by my first assessment that generalities are harmful and ignorant. There needs to be a movement of desublimation for reclaiming and redefining the feminine experience independent of "generalities" and "rules".
good discussion.
The first post was a generalization. (posted by flowrktty)
The second post was an example of the generalization perhaps being flawed (posted by Lorcas)
The third post supported the first post (posted by trenacheal)
The fourth post explored the impact of the generalization, and a refutation. (posted by Lorcas)
The fifth and sixth post were clarification questions that may have led to a misunderstanding.
You gave me a simple question, i responded with a simple answer. I believe that was a fair transaction. That being said, i did not intend to say that you "were harmful or ignorant".
It can be inferred reasonably that you arrived in defense of the notion that "women like Jerks" since you posted directly after my second post. So, you were defending a generality, on some level you agreed and at this point in the post, continued to perpetuate this generality. That being said, the last portion of my post was directed at the notion of "women being attracted to jerks". The notion of "women being attracted to jerks" is harmful and ignorant, in and of itself. This was not a personal attack or an assessment of your character.
I have not read your other post, I was only reading responses directed towards me.
Also, I think that you make a fair judgment about men and women perhaps not realizing they are in a unhealthy relationship.
I think that you have clarified what your intent was.
My only quibble was that it was not clear that it was both women and men, rather it was uniquely women who were being duped.
I do stand by my first assessment that generalities are harmful and ignorant. There needs to be a movement of desublimation for reclaiming and redefining the feminine experience independent of "generalities" and "rules".
good discussion.
This idea of feminine independence is not new...
LOL! That's right! haha...
Well, from some of my personal experience, I can say I definately have been attracted to jerks. Big ones. Big Jerks. And the thing about big jerks is that when they don't like you they are big jerks! But when they do.... oh boy, it's a lot of fun for a little while, but then it's over as fast as it started. In my experience the jerks find some other girl and move on a lot quicker that the nice guys. Now I am with a nice guy who can be a jerk sometimes. But then again, I can be a jerk sometimes too!
It's a vicious cycle!!! I think you'd experience the same thing if you were with me. Just putting it out there! I can be sarcastic and crass and at the same time nice and sweet
Stay tuned for a writing work entitled "Ode to a Karoake Jockey" LOL!